Snacks Across the Pond

10th December 2007

Oreos

Filed under: Biscuits/Cookies, From the US, Savoury, Sweet — Philip @ 10.15 pm

I know Oreos. I have never had them before, but I know of them. I know that they were invented in Baltimore and had a baseball team named after them. They are so famous that Philip J. Fry makes Oreos in the future. Whilst I haven’t eaten Oreos themselves I am aware of the general concept, that of a creamy filling sandwiched between two biscuits to form a crunchy, creamy experience, similar to the chocolatey Bourbons or buttery Custard Creams over here. Oreos seem to be half-way between the two, with chocolate biscuits encasing a light-coloured centre.

How to try them. I could peel the biscuit off the creamy centre and taste the parts individually, or I can crunch in to a whole Oreo and have the complete experience. I shall try the whole Oreo experience to start with.

My, that’s a dark biscuit. It doesn’t smell particularly chocolatey for something so dark, it has a rather pleasant biscuit smell. I also have a sneaking suspicion that Ebony and Ivory was written for this biscuit, and all that talk about pianos was a diversion to hide a sweet tooth.

Crunch crunch! Hmm, there’s not much taste when first bitten in to, but, my goodness, there is certainly some strong taste a few chews in, and it lingers. That’s quite powerful. I’m not entirely convinced I can taste the creamy centre, such is the strength of the biscuit and the thinness of the centre. Needs more creamy goodness! I can see why people peel these apart to eat the sections separately. Our own Custard Creams and Bourbons at least have enough filling to be tasted alongside the biscuit. Or maybe the biscuit is blander, which is probably true of the Custard Cream. Anyway, time to press on!

It occurs to me that the creamy centre offers two advantages. One is that it cushions the bite against the crunchy biscuit. The other is to soften the palate with its creaminess before the heavy chocolate biscuit taste kicks in. Mind you, the strength of the biscuit peters slightly with subsequent bites, or maybe it’s dulled my taste buds more than a vindaloo could.

Let me try the components separately. Before I do that, a quick diversion. The packaging is quite neat, with an easy open pull tab that actually both opens easily and reseals effectively, which I noticed when plucking a second biscuit from within. I am suitably impressed! This is technology that we could borrow over here. Although I have to admit to being a little ignorant of the state of the British biscuit packaging I wouldn’t be surprised to find out that a biscuit tin or jar is still required to decant all the biscuits of a pack in order to keep them fresh. The Oreo packaging is a neat, self-contained unit.

Back to the biscuit itself. Twisting the biscuits with opposite torque pulls the two biscuits apart from the creamy filling glue with little effort, although the centre adheres to both bits of the biscuit and is not found whole on one half. Scraping the filling off and tasting it reveals it to be mostly tasteless but sweet, with more of a fondant texture than the creamy fillings I’m used to here. It may simply be a sweet counterpart to the bitter biscuit, let me see. Yes, that seems about right. That’s a strong biscuit, and any flavour in the filling would be lost when eaten as a whole. I’m sure I couldn’t eat too many of the biscuits without the filling either. The two halves seem quite enough by themselves, and the filling by itself doesn’t really do anything for me. The Oreo as a whole is pretty tasty, but I think I’d prefer a Bourbon to be honest.

6th December 2007

They’re Whoppers!

Filed under: From the US, Sweet, Sweets/Candy — Philip @ 4.20 pm

Next up from the package of awesomeness that Kerri sent are Whoppers. I must admit that I’ve had Whoppers before, on my last visit to the US. Picking out some sweets to eat I noticed these, looking to be identical to our own Maltesers. That is, the chocolatey balls of sweetness look identical, the package itself is a curiosity, being a milk carton. As Whoppers are marketed as ‘malted milk balls’ I am assuming that the milk carton packaging is intentional. I never though of Maltesers as being milky, though. And there’s a reason for that.

Although there is a distinct resemblance to Maltesers, Whoppers are not Maltesers. The basic idea is the same, with a small ball of sugar surrounded by a milk chocolate shell, and I like the idea. Whoppers, however, unlike Maltesers, are actually milky in flavour. There is a certain sweet, milkyness to them, which can go by unnoticed if Whoppers are eaten in isolation to the UK sweet, but is quite obvious if Maltesers are tried side-by-side with this US snack. The difference in flavour is notable whether one crunches down on the chocolatey ball, or lets the whole ball melt in the mouth and dissolve down one’s throat. I’m torn between the two methods of eating them myself. The first causes an explosion of flavour that combines the milky, malty centre with the chocolate, but ploughs through them at an alarming rate; the second prolongs the whole experience, allowing the chocolate and then the malty ball to be savoured in all their glory, and makes the packet last for longer too.

I got Chrid, who had not tasted Whoppers before, to try them out and his reaction showed a benefit of the milk carton packaging, in that the sweets can be chugged, like milk, straight from the carton. Dammit, don’t Bogart the Whoppers.

Chrid chugs my Whoppers

I can’t say whether I prefer Maltesers or Whoppers. I like both, but haven’t got any Maltesers handy to compare them to directly. Whoppers are jolly nice, and great for a snack. The large packet size is, I would say, a good thing. Instead of being compelled to eat a whole albeit small bag of Maltesers in one sitting, the milk carton packaging allows one to dip in for a handful every now and again and close the packet up, just as one would a normal milk carton, without the balls spilling everywhere. The packaging also allows for a lot of space to add recipes for pies and milkshakes, with the Whoppers acting as textured sugar, so I doubt I’ll try them out, as well as a wonderful claim that the sweets contain ‘30% less fat’ along with small print that this is in relation to ‘the average of the leading chocolate candy brands’ that makes it so vague as to be nearly meaningless. It’s a nice thought, though.

3rd December 2007

There’s Something about Prawn Cocktail

Filed under: Crisps/Chips, From the UK, Savoury, Sweet, Sweets/Candy — Tags: , , — kerri @ 2.19 pm

Years and years ago, at least ten now, I experienced the most wondrous thing. On a visit to England, I had a go at some Wotsits, prawn cocktail flavor. Now, it sounded pretty gross, and I only tried them on a whim. Kind of like those booger-flavored Bertie Botts Beans.

But no. Gross was not to be, not with the old P.C. I couldn’t get enough. I tried the Walker’s P.C. crisps (they’re really potato chips, but I’ll call them crisps so as to not anger the gods of prawn cocktail). They, too, rocked my socks.

This was also the visit when I met the revered Crunchie Bar. The Crunchie holds a place of worship in my home. Their shiny gold labels adorn…well, ok, I saved a few of them, on a shelf in a closet. I like shiny things, but I’m not that much of a freak.

small packet of Skips, prawn cocktail flavorSo it was with divine wonder that I opened a parcel from Philip, and it contained both Crunchies AND the idols that are bags of prawn-cocktail Skips. Now, I’d not had Skips before. They are these lovely little discs, each looks a bit like a sand dollar, actually, only about an inch in diameter. They’re made of corn or rice or something, and they positively melt in your mouth. The prawn-cocktail flavor is perfect for the amount of solid food you’re getting, and at only 89 calories (USAian kcal) per bag, MANG. I could go on a diet with these.

OK, not so with the Crunchies. Not diet food. But ah, so sublime. I eat my Crunchies in an unconventional way — first I crack off the chocolate coating with my teeth, as much as I can, and only then to I revel in dissolving the sweet, crunchy honeycomb on my tongue. Why they don’t sell these in the US I will never understand. They’re similar to the Aussies’ Violet Crumble…but better, I think.

So, with this first parcel, Philip has helped me to rekindle two old flames…ahhh, sweet, sweet junk food love.

Powered by WordPress